If this is your first visit, You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I like them both and would rather neither of them get pulled. If I had to choose, I would prefer D. Peak to get pulled.
Same.
Apache
Where do you put the Bayonet?
Chesty Puller (upon seeing a flamethrower for the first time)
I am all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Lets start with typewriters.
Frank Lloyd Wright
Now if you want to remove firestorm I would be all for that
Definitely DO NOT remove firestorm. I love that map. I know there are alot of snipers, but once you get into the Jet, you're all set to go
I need to play more ground game haha. Been in the jet so long that I feel Jet Lagged haha
But please don't remove firestorm. As for Tehran or Demavand, I would much much rather have Demavand removed because people there are just ridiculous. Loads and I mean loads of teamkilling. I like to do a few kills through the tunnel and push up, not lay there in the doorway waiting to kill or get killed.
it is a shame you have to pull any map...i love them all...they all have there great points to them....its a shame that every one dont know the power of a great squad team work play and think they need to camp way in the back to get a kill....love to work as a team best gamming exp. ever love it
Tough decision there, both are great and full of problems at the same time haha.
Damavand really isn't all that bad, it's the kind of map where you can educate peeps a bit and show them that the map is much more fun when it's full of CLR, aka full of squad/team players.. it's sort of a theatre for a great show (if a team decides to control the whole map and actually work together, it's amazing)
Tehran is simply amazing, you can get your fix of action wherever you want, the US nooblets who camp up their spawn should learn to play, but heh, gotta live with it!
Basically both maps can be amazing if we get more regulars to play the server/maps the real bf3 teamplay way, I remember the tf2 days where it was easy to communicate with the whole team over voice chat, instead of teamspeak.. when it was time to PUSH LITTOL KART on the point people would respond and work together!
Keep Tehran, ditch the other one. How realistic is it to even have flags in a tunnel like that when you capture the outsides and just hold off and starve the forces in there. It doesn't make sense and is very chaotic. At least Tehran is a night map and makes use of the special scopes and has wide-spread action.
I'm telling you, it's gonna get boring real fast with only a few maps. I think we miss a lot of action on others maps.
And lets face it, you can never please everyone with a certain map rotation. But you can at least keep if from being boring if nothing else. If we go down to just 3 maps, I dont think that is gonna interest anyone very much.
And I'll say it one last time. More maps with only one time playing each might be more fun.
Think about it. You get killed from being mortar spammed in Seine the whole game and then you have to turn around and endure it for another round. Not my specialty. It's a morale killer for sure. Whereas maybe you get the crap kicked out of you one game, but at least you know it will be over and you can try another map out and see if you do better.
[COLOR="#008080"][/COLOR][SIZE="5"][COLOR="LightBlue"][B]Not everything that counts on the battlefield is countable.[/B][/COLOR][/SIZE]
Comment