CLR's need to pickup and take notice of other CLR complaints about other players.
They do not take the time to investage and check on the the "proof" that a person is using a exploit or even a hack.
Look I am asking for a a fair shake. If an admin does not believe an individual. That is ok.
However, if other CLR players take a notice. An admin on the server is notified. Then they must make a determination. If the player(s) do not like the determination they can leave. However, the admin must switch sides. Then can or can not determine a "true" exploit is being comitted.
Must the CLR wait for other server or PB to look for unbalancing features?
They do not take the time to investage and check on the the "proof" that a person is using a exploit or even a hack.
Look I am asking for a a fair shake. If an admin does not believe an individual. That is ok.
However, if other CLR players take a notice. An admin on the server is notified. Then they must make a determination. If the player(s) do not like the determination they can leave. However, the admin must switch sides. Then can or can not determine a "true" exploit is being comitted.
Must the CLR wait for other server or PB to look for unbalancing features?
Comment