Pistol choosing

[toxic_tomato]

which pistol do you guys prefer and why...i like the the takao because i find it has better aiming.and faster shooting

[killa_zn]

imo they both are crap to me, as a sniper sometimes it cant save my life. and very unbalanced to the other if it was a EU vs PAC pistol fight.
but if i had to choose, it be the pac's

[BenKenobi]

pacs is much better and you can fire faster, aim better, and it has more bullets

[{CLR} Naillik]

PAC = More bullets.
Thats a keeper for me.

[juneau]

PAC for me too. I seem to aim better with it..... or maybe it's just luck.

[goldenfooler]

which ever one has the revovler look.. seems stronger.

[mapes]

which ever one has the revovler look.. seems stronger.

I think thats the EU one. I personaly prefer the EU one cause I like how it looks...reminds me of a friends 357

[thedeadlyassassin]

They both suck.


EA and DICE messed up, the 92FS and MR-44 were great pistols, then tehy went to this?


Some kind of future we are going to live in... Crappy atrillery, crappy tanks that can die in 1 hit, 3 round sniper rifles, piles of crap pistols.... jeez...

[Munkee121]

yea in BF2 I sniped someone from 250m with the pistol

[FieryDragon]

PAC... faster more ammo and looks better!

[Grisu]

yea in BF2 I sniped someone from 250m with the pistol

The good old days...

[{CLR} Naillik]

yea in BF2 I sniped someone from 250m with the pistol

The good old days...

They return!

I love the 92FS
And of course, my best friend Mr. G3

[KJHenf]

They both suck.


EA and DICE messed up, the 92FS and MR-44 were great pistols, then tehy went to this?


Some kind of future we are going to live in... Crappy atrillery, crappy tanks that can die in 1 hit, 3 round sniper rifles, piles of crap pistols.... jeez...

yeah I guess EA and DICE really dont think technology and warfare is going to change in the next 130 something years.

[Dead_And_Gone]

If I have to pull out the pistol, I'm in trouble anyway.

Partial to the big hog looking revolver myself. Having worked armed security before, I have my reasons. Asthetics or usefulness, it just IS for me.

Had some police buddies in a fire fight about a year ago. All had those spiffy 9mm Glocks. Punched holes in the bad guys, and just PO'd them.. lol went on for an hour.

Officer responds and comes the the scene, walks up with a .357 magnum. 1 shot to each guy. Problem solved.



I DID carry my 6" .357 most of the time, but my Gold Cup .45 with special rounds was nice also. Although I never had to use either, No-one was going to walk away if I had to use them.

So I'm partial to the revolver, just a traditionalist.

[mapes]

If I have to pull out the pistol, I'm in trouble anyway.

Partial to the big hog looking revolver myself. Having worked armed security before, I have my reasons. Asthetics or usefulness, it just IS for me.

Had some police buddies in a fire fight about a year ago. All had those spiffy 9mm Glocks. Punched holes in the bad guys, and just PO'd them.. lol went on for an hour.

Officer responds and comes the the scene, walks up with a .357 magnum. 1 shot to each guy. Problem solved.



I DID carry my 6" .357 most of the time, but my Gold Cup .45 with special rounds was nice also. Although I never had to use either, No-one was going to walk away if I had to use them.

So I'm partial to the revolver, just a traditionalist.

I've fired a 357 nice gun but, it just puts holes into water filled plastic milk jugs. To turn them inside out you need to use a 44. Man that was a fun revolver to shoot although the hard pistol grip felt like someone hitting your hand with a hammer.