So heres my first impressions of MoH
1. I don't know if the server browser is horked or not as there is no CLR server to find or not
2. Graphics although I think the graphics are better for some reason they are also just as bad. I'm struck by how cartoony they are. I can't explain it really it kinda reminds me if they tried to copy the style of borderlands and failed
3. Game play for some reason I pickup the game play way faster than BO prolly because I've missed the the last few CoD games and I've been play BC2. Game play was fun although I'm unsure of the objectives of some of the game modes. Meaning they're not named intuitively. I couldn't even tell you what modes I played.
4. Max players are 24 which is still too damn small for me
5. I didn't drive any vehicles but, then again I didn't drive any in BO
6. The maps seem even smaller and tighter than BO. Yes they're are some wide open areas in the maps but, on the object maps the attackers quickly get funneled in to a couple of lines of attack. I can't explain it it just feels like the maps are designed to force you to go certain ways.
7. This game also has a feel of a game designed from the ground up as primarily a console port to PC same as BO.
8. There was no lag what so ever
9. Hacking was rampant in one outta the three servers I tried even with PB. Some type of wallhack/aimbot sniper one shot death.
So in a unbiased opinion of both games I actually think BO is a better multiplayer. Which surprised me since I've been fairly biased towards BF2 and etc... Now to be honest I think BC2 is a better multiplayer experience than both games put together.
1. I don't know if the server browser is horked or not as there is no CLR server to find or not
2. Graphics although I think the graphics are better for some reason they are also just as bad. I'm struck by how cartoony they are. I can't explain it really it kinda reminds me if they tried to copy the style of borderlands and failed
3. Game play for some reason I pickup the game play way faster than BO prolly because I've missed the the last few CoD games and I've been play BC2. Game play was fun although I'm unsure of the objectives of some of the game modes. Meaning they're not named intuitively. I couldn't even tell you what modes I played.
4. Max players are 24 which is still too damn small for me
5. I didn't drive any vehicles but, then again I didn't drive any in BO
6. The maps seem even smaller and tighter than BO. Yes they're are some wide open areas in the maps but, on the object maps the attackers quickly get funneled in to a couple of lines of attack. I can't explain it it just feels like the maps are designed to force you to go certain ways.
7. This game also has a feel of a game designed from the ground up as primarily a console port to PC same as BO.
8. There was no lag what so ever
9. Hacking was rampant in one outta the three servers I tried even with PB. Some type of wallhack/aimbot sniper one shot death.
So in a unbiased opinion of both games I actually think BO is a better multiplayer. Which surprised me since I've been fairly biased towards BF2 and etc... Now to be honest I think BC2 is a better multiplayer experience than both games put together.
Comment